jackilam
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit jackilam's Xanga Site!

Name: jacky
Birthday: 11/27/1985
Gender: Male


Interests: loves anything and everything that life offers! (...good stuff that is)
Expertise: let's not go there
Occupation: legal
Industry: art


Message: message me


Member Since: 6/1/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
aice7
ali_ma
Alrex
antiheroine
azncuriousgeorge
Baoxite
bjaiwong
blankaroo
bwebbjr
cadunz
cassy2003
celesteluk
CerineLee
cherish_k
Christopher_Choi
cindysiusin
cknc31
clara_li
crystaaallle
cxk2773
daniel_rock
daryldsh
derrrrrek
elisalaprincesa
emilytfan
ethel930
EUNICEKANG
evacmyu
fulfilledinjesus
gordy_m
haleychow
happyjosh
Harolzoidium
Hayleybaby
HOLY_Diary
horseaddict
hughip
ica_ica
icetim
ileung
iVANNNNNNN
jackieau
janettlaw
jennfern
jennynny
joeychen
kawaii_polly
kerfin
kevinkamster
kfcrml
koinoniaHK
kookies
LauraLin
LaYDeEJoL
leungmy
maggieylw
marcopolosilver
mokky
mr_avery
nadzwong
natural_state
Ngaiwy
notidown
oopsgigi
opo0oqo
orcscar
orpheux
patricklau426
PCHW
pink_onelove
revivednetvavo
samhung
sharon923
shirrrrrley
skkw_garry
sluncheung
smug_isi
stephs_here
stupidirene
Swearmaster
sweetmanchukid
taikoo_pride
timistgut
tomahtoe
tonync
tranilla
TRUTHS_4_LIFE
willllllllllie
woo_mei_mei
wormization
wpygloria
yemsee
Z_Kingdom
zenonyeung
zoyce

Blogrings
The Hk Tonbridgians
previous - random - next

- Send me back to 852 -
previous - random - next

London School of Economics (LSE)
previous - random - next

jesus is not religion
previous - random - next

Summerbridge Hong Kong
previous - random - next

Kong Fuk Church Hong Kong (KFC)
previous - random - next

GSIS class of 2003
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Monday, April 28, 2008

Last entry

Dear all,

Much to my dismay, I am planning to stop writing entries in this blog.  Though I notice that one or two still read this space, I've decided to move on to something more Christ-focused, here @ http://thesentone.wordpress.com

Not to say that Xanga is not capable of being Christ-focused, but I wanted to start afresh on a new blog, where all entries are based on one thing alone - proclaiming Christ.  The blog isn't simply thematics or whatnot (stuff which I will variably write in my own time and post on that site eventually), but it is purely focused on biblical exegesis and hermeneutics.  What good would it be to write theme-related Christian writings if our generation is suffering from biblical illiteracy?  For the same Scripture can be twisted to support all types of nonsensical doctrines.

Please drop by the new site.  I hope it does the job of edifying fellow Christians, and furthermore challenge non-Christians to understand what Scripture really teaches and what implications Jesus Christ has in the lives of all men and women.  It is not a guide-book, rule-book or even a book on morality.  It is a book about salvation history, it is a biography of Christ (John 5:39), the only man who is the full radiance of God.  The man sent from God to proclaim the objective Truth in the world.  Therefore, let's not make it into philosophical banter about ourselves, but a theological blog about Him :)



Tuesday, December 11, 2007

What does it mean to "love God"?

It is so easy today to belittle the true meaning of love, and many times do we attribute that type of corrupted, sinful love to God.  We believe we love God because we sing worship songs high and low, loud and soft; we believe we love God because of emotional feelings of happiness due to a particular church service, encouragement from ministry leaders, or even when life seems so wonderful, we "thank" God for such blessings (only to secretly covet these blessings as if we have earned them by ourselves). 

In times of darkness, when big and small choices are laid for us to make (as God had intended starting from Adam), to prove our faith, it is no longer a choice of morality for Christians.  It is a simple choice of whether we love God or not.

God is eternal; He is Love divine and just (since saying that "He is love" is hardly understood by Christians and non-Christians alike, as I've already mentioned the haphazard meanings attributed to 'love' today).  If we do not concur with either of these points, then we are leading lives of sinful behaviours and patterns, a life no different than that of our non-Christian brethren.

Since the fall of Adam and Eve, we are all susceptible to making our own plans to quicken God's pace a little, as if we can usurp his role in fulfilling a particular purpose.  Eve's naming of Cain, the "god-man" (since Eve had thought that the seed mentioned in Genesis 3 was Cain), hoping that God's salvation was immediate to our own selfish desire and not according to his divine timing; Moses' tapping on the rock to obtain water when our Lord specifically told him not to; Israel's whining in the Old Testament, and God's continual patience through the provision of kings and judges (against His preference); Paul requesting a thorn to be taken out of his side, when God claimed that He alone is sufficient.

These are just a few of many instances where man is limited by TIME.  However, if we love God, we should pursue the ETERNAL, and that every decision we make should have a contribution to eternity.  If we truly love God the way He wants us to love Him, then we would surely make decisions which glorify and represent him, decisions of an eternal perspective.  Every decision made in haste has implications of self-will, self-determination, self-confidence, self-control (in an unbiblical sense unlike that suggested in Galatians 5).  Can you agree that every argument, every sinful sexual behaviour outside of marriage (or even within!), every contention, every unbiblical hostility (as opposed to 'righteous anger' which we can only emulate an OUNCE of, compared with Jesus' fully righteous anger), every dissatisfaction with life (aka what we DESERVE and that no one else seems to agree) stems from the very problem of our temporal focus and nature?  Contrarily, every decision made in temperance, in patience, looking at the long-term (should I say 'eternal'-term?) is as Christ did - he waited for the opportune moment to die on the cross.  He waited for the opportune moment, though he KNEW he was going to have a short life, to do as his Father willed.  In the same way we should wait, be patient for God's will and stand firm during this period of peace WITH GOD.  Decisions of an eternal perspective will not only allow us to see, to taste, to feel the very Lord whom we worship, but others will see it too.  Decisions made for the sake of eternity will baffle non-believers, will be seen as irrational, will be seen as sources of healing in relationships, and undoubtedly will be seen as truly counter-cultural. 

Do we have the same kind of perspective on God?  Do we love "ETERNITY"?  Or do we love cheap thrills, short-term fulfillments (gossips, lust, slander, food, toys, self-fulfilled charities, one-off ministry service, non-planned acts of goodness without any intention to evangelise, half-hearted evangelism, looking @ number saved rather than the quality of those saved), rather than investment in our talents, planting seeds in non-Christian hearts, and watching them grow not in thorns lest they be choked, not on hard ground lest they never grow at all, but watching them grow SLOWLY in soft soil.  Are we going to make every decision in our life on an ETERNAL perspective, on a LOVE that is both DIVINE and JUST (a.k.a obeying God's commandments as explicitly stated in the Bible, differentiating us from those who are still slaves to sin so that people can really taste, smell and see the Lord and not merely an ethereal image of Him).  Let us not focus overly on God's love as defined on a temporal scale.  We are, indeed, temporary creatures of this world.  We are merely STEWARDS.  But God called us to make an impact unlike that of a conventional human steward; we are called to make an impact on an eternal scale, starting from our hearts and shifting our mindset of a stand-alone sinner trying to change the world through temporal means, to that of a stand-by-Christ sinner trying to change the world through ETERNAL means with the counsel of the Holy Spirit working through us.

Again, I challenge you, do you love ETERNITY?  Or do you want to stay attached to your investments to a world that will die, much like our physical bodies?  Every decision made in haste is a reflection of that struggle between flesh and Spirit; yet every decision made in temperance, in patience, looking to God for his approval and for his timing, will allow God's glory to be fully shown. 

ETERNITY and DEATH, OBEDIENCE and SIN, the polemic opposites which God understands to be the driving force behind every decision made in this world, is already blurred in the heathen world.  Let us therefore store EVEN MORE treasures in heaven, and love eternity and obedience even more.  Let us love LOVE, ETERNITY, HOLINESS, above all CHRIST and ALL THAT HE STANDS FOR to really present ourselves as Christians even more-so in love with Him, just as Christ loved the Father so much that nothing can stand in the way of the Lord's will even at the cost of Christ, the divine King of my righteousness, being debased to that of a criminal.  All for what sake?  That WE be presented alongside Christ no longer as temporal beings with temporal ambitions fulfilled by temporal decisions and commitments, but that we become the eternal WIFE of the Son, the fourth corner of the Trinity if you will, filled with UNCOMPROMISING love and JOY for the Lord unceasingly.

I for one, would like to praise the Lord without compromise.  :)  and you?



Sunday, October 28, 2007

The way we live as Christians

"When we consider how we are to live we are not part of a general consideration of what is good and what is evil. We are not part of a general quest that the human race is working on together. We are not part of a universal consultation process. No, we are deliberately and self-consciously cutting ourselves off from the ethical discussions of pagan society and deliberately and self-consciously attempting to think good and evil from our redemption in Jesus Christ, the second Adam who renounces his own will, his own choice, and knowledge of good and evil in favour of the choice and knowledge of his Father in heaven. If we ask the question hat should we do??there are basically just two answers: trust in Jesus Christ if I am not yet a Christian, or present the gospel of Jesus Christ if I am already a Christian. Christian ethics has one single central point ?the gospel of Jesus Christ. Our first concern in all ethical thinking is how we may present the gospel of Jesus Christ. Our behaviour has no meaning or purpose beyond that."

Paul Blackham, Associate minister for theology, All Souls Church, Langham Place, London


Monday, October 22, 2007

"Modern" Worship Music

New Trends in Music

Below is an extract from an American Newspaper objecting to new trends in church music.

here are several reasons for opposing it. One, it too new. Two, it often worldly, even blasphemous. The new Christian music is not as pleasant as the more established style. Because there are so many new songs, you can learn them all. It puts too much emphasis on instrumental music rather than godly lyrics. This new music creates disturbances making people act indecently and disorderly. The preceding generation got along without it. It a money making scam and some of these new music upstarts are lewd and loose.?/p>

Who were they attacking? It wasn't Delirious? or Matt Redman. They were attacking the hymn writer Isaac Watts, famous for writing hen I survey,?in 1723! The old hymns once upon a time were radical and cutting edge. Our music and our songs must also always be pushing new ground. Let's go for it.*


*Taken from Tim Hughes' Blog @ http://www.worshipcentral.org/blog/tim


Perhaps this will change the way people view church music nowadays?  The same people who 'love' hymns over 'contemporary' worship music... do we love the hymns because they are edifying to the Lord, or do we love them because WE are used to it, and that is how church 'should be'?  Since, after all, it is about giving the right sacrifice to God, not just any half-hearted sacrifice...


Wednesday, August 29, 2007

News Update #3

Praise God 

--

Taliban to free 19 S. Korean hostages

By AMIR SHAH, Associated Press Writer 10 minutes ago

GHAZNI, Afghanistan - Taliban militants agreed Tuesday to release 19 South Korean church volunteers held hostage for six weeks after Seoul reaffirmed a pledge to withdraw its troops by year's end and prevent Christian missionaries from working in Afghanistan.

As many as eight of the hostages could be freed on Wednesday, a Taliban representative said.

The militants apparently backed away from demands for a prisoner exchange. But the Taliban, who killed two South Korean hostages last month, could emerge with enhanced political legitimacy for negotiating successfully with a foreign government.

Also Tuesday, a suicide bomber attacked NATO troops helping build a bridge in eastern Afghanistan, killing three American soldiers, a U.S. official said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because not all families had been notified. NATO, in announcing the attack, said six soldiers also were wounded.

The accord for the South Koreans' release came during one of the bloodiest periods of the Taliban's war against U.S. and NATO forces since the Taliban regime was toppled in late 2001 after the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States.

South Korea's decision to hold face-to-face negotiations with the militants may dismay the United States government, which refuses to talk to the Taliban.

"Maybe they (the Taliban) did not achieve all that they demanded, but they achieved a lot in terms of political credibility," said Mustafa Alani, director of security and terrorism studies at the Dubai-based Gulf Research Center. "The fact that the Koreans negotiated with them directly and more or less in their territory ... is in itself an achievement."

State Department spokesman Tom Casey said Tuesday that the U.S. wanted the Koreans returned to their families and stressed that U.S. policy was not to make concessions to terrorists.

The Taliban kidnapped 23 Koreans as they traveled by bus from Kabul to Kandahar on July 19. The militants killed two male hostages in late July, then freed two women captives earlier this month.

Taliban spokesman Qari Yousef Ahmadi had said that the South Koreans ?mostly women in their 20s and 30s ?would be freed "in the coming days" and that tribal elders would act as go-betweens. The captives are believed to be held in several different locations, and Ahmadi said that it might take several days to free them all.

On Wednesday, Mullah Basheer, a Taliban commander involved in the talks, said the militants will "hopefully" free five to eight captives that day ?including at least one man. He did not give further details.

The deal for the hostages' release was struck during talks between Taliban negotiators and South Korean diplomats in the central city of Ghazni. The Afghan government was not party to the negotiations, which were mediated by the International Committee of the Red Cross.

The hostages' relatives in South Korea welcomed news of the deal.

"I would like to dance," said Cho Myung-ho, mother of 28-year-old hostage Lee Joo-yeon.

South Korean presidential spokesman Cheon Ho-sun said the deal had been reached "on the condition that South Korea withdraws troops by the end of the year and South Korea suspends missionary work in Afghanistan."

Seoul already had said it would withdraw its 200 soldiers in the country this year. It also has sought to prevent missionaries from traveling to countries where they are not wanted.

The South Korean government and relatives of the hostages have stressed that the kidnapped South Koreans were not Christian missionaries, but were doing aid work.

Missionaries from South Korea and dozens of other countries have historically been active in Afghanistan, and there is no way of knowing how many are in the country. Most operate without the knowledge of their governments, and there is some disagreement about the boundaries between missionary work, proselytizing and Christian-inspired aid efforts.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, a former South Korean foreign minister, said he exerted "all possible efforts" as secretary-general to obtain the release of the hostages, talking to leaders in Afghanistan and the region who might have influence.

"I'm pleased to hear that news and I welcome that news that both the Korean government and Taliban representatives have agreed to release the remaining 19 hostages," he said. "At this time I do hope that they will be released as soon as possible."

Taliban spokesmen have insisted they had no interest in a ransom payment. The South Korean presidential spokesman, Cheon, told The Associated Press that he had been informed by South Korean officials in Afghanistan that money was not discussed with the Taliban.

Cha Sung-min, whose 32-year-old sister, Cha Hye-jin, was among the hostages, said he was "sorry to the public for causing concern, but we thank the government officials for the (impending) release."

"Still, our hearts are broken as two died, so we convey our sympathy to the bereaved family members," said Cha Sung-min, who has served as a spokesman for the hostages' relatives.



Next 5 >>


<bgsound src="http://images.jackylam.multiply.com/song/1/4/full/UmFuZG9tSVb.4B6wzRohlA,cYZiYUAln4SGFOErcqKOi9UF,87D14A==/Jeremy%20Camp%20-%20Beautiful%20One.mp3" loop="infinite">